Monday, March 20, 2017

Blog Post #1- Stephanie Clinch

The other day I found something pertinent to what we have been learning about mechanical reproduction. I was watching The Twilight Zone on Netflix and came upon a particular episode called “I Sing the Body Electric” (Season 3, Episode 35), and thought that it communicated what we know about aura and how it relates to reproduction, as well as the gray zone between human and robot.
            In this episode, a family loses their mother and they contemplate how to replace her. The son, Tom, comes across an ad by Facsimile Ltd. in a Modern Science magazine, for a robotic grandmother. This company sells "an electric data processing system" in a model called "I Sing the Body Electric" that can give loving supervision to a family. The family picks out a new “Grandma”/robot to replace the deceased mother.
Two of the three children, Tom and Karen, are elated with “Grandma” and find her incredible and magical. The oldest child, Anne, however, does not accept the new mother easily. This is where I think that aura comes into play—although “Grandma” can do everything their mother could do ten times better, Anne feels the difference between “Grandma” and her mother. "She's not real, she's a machine", she says. Furthermore, Anne felt abandoned after her mother died and to have a new mother who is oblivious to the negativity that she’s feeling toward motherly figures seems impossible to her. In the end, although the robot is efficient, Anne does not feel as though she is a better mother nor even her mother.
            At the beginning of the episode, there is a quote that pertains to aura and robots:
“They make a fairly convincing pitch here. It doesn't seem possible, though, to find a woman who must be ten times better than mother in order to seem half as good, except, of course, in the Twilight Zone”
This quote foreshadows the entire episode and addresses the topic of robots being better in general at tasks, but lacking the aura associated with an authentic person. This is seen when Anne is almost run over by a car, but “Grandma” pushes her out of the way and gets hit instead ("ten times better"). After this, Anne accepts “Grandma” seeing as she will not abandon her so abruptly as her mother did, and this may be the difference in aura that she feltthat "Grandma" was not as human and fragile. In the end, since “Grandma” was not meant to be an exact replica of their mother and because she is so competent, aura was able to be overlooked.
Also, since this is the Twilight Zone, Robot Grandma proves to be remarkably capable of emotions all throughout the episode, making it difficult to decipher whether she is human or robotic, except that she is much more capable. Would robots be able to feel emotions and act as humans? Surely, they are better at everything than humans are, but do they really care? The Twilight Zone captures the gray zone between robot and human.
            Thus, aura is no longer important to Anne, because although the robot doesn’t feel like her mother, she chooses to accept a better, more resistant mother. Over time, the family gets along even better with “Grandma” and although she is not the same as their mother, she is superior in many ways. When the children are grown up and ready to leave for college, “Grandma” announces that she must leave because she is no longer of use. The children and “Grandma” express sadness at her departure, but she says that if she can continue being a good grandmother, she’ll be gifted with “life and humanity”. Was she not already human (she felt emotions)? Did interacting with people make her human, or, ultimately, is that how she will become human? What about aura? Where does robot end and where does human start? Does she have an aura? If she has a different aura than the mother she is replacing, is her own aura human? Is it possible to combine aura and robots? Are people able to accept superiority over aura?

Thursday, March 2, 2017

Show and tell presentation

The idea that people have a sixth sense has been a long-debated topic. A sixth sense goes beyond a person’s normal senses (sight, sound, taste, touch, and smell), and allows them to sense deeper and feel the aura of an object or person. For example, when a dog meets a new person they will usually either growl at the person or go up to them and get petted by them. In a way, this is an example of a dog using its sixth sense to feel a person’s aura.  

We have talked a lot in class about a person’s aura and their sixth sense, which is why I chose this episode of Supernatural for my show and tell presentation. I have been watching Supernatural for a while now and was watching this episode when I realized it sort of had to do with the idea of a sixth sense and feeling someones aura. In the scene, Sam is in the dark attempting to fight the vampire named Gordon. Sam must use his sixth sense and Gordon’s aura to determine where Gordon is, so Sam can fight him. If Sam did not have the ability to sense where Gordon was based off his aura he may have been killed.

In life, there are a lot of cases I think where we can sense someone’s aura and may not even realize it. Have you ever had that feeling where you meet someone and just don’t “feel” like they’re a good person? That is sensing their aura. I think with animals it can sometimes go deeper than that. Animals have a stronger sense of a person’s aura, which is why they may growl at some people or be scared of some things. For example, my family has a friend that my dogs are terrified of for some reason. He is a great guy that is very nice, and we could never figure out what it was that would scare my dogs. Eventually he found out he had cancer, but he treated it and went into remission. As soon as he came over after being in remisison my dogs were fine around him and no longer scared. In this case, I think they could sense his aura and knew something was wrong that scared them. As soon as he was healthy again, nothing seemed out of the ordinary with his aura, so they were okay around him.

Throughout the episode and the season Gordon talks about how there is something off about Sam and he can “just feel it”. The audience knows that Sam has demon blood in his veins and that is what is wrong, but Gordon does not know that and simply can sense Sam’s aura. I think the idea of a sixth sense and aura is very real. If you pay attention, there is evidence of it all throughout life.


I could not find the actual video of this episode on youtube but it is on Netflix. It is season three episode 7.

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

Director's Cut

            I found it surprising how the Director’s cut of Blade Runner, and the original were so different. I was astonished by how different the two endings of the movie were. The ending of the original movie really changed the ending effect that the movie had on the viewers. Ridley Scott, the director, was bound to his contract in 1982, when directing this movie, so the final movie wasn’t how he imagined. In 2007, he decided to reproduce the movie, but this time as he imagined it.
            To Ridley Scott, another version of the movie HAD to be created. The original movie wasn’t what Scott wanted, and thus the aura of the movie had changed. The movie ended with a happy scene with them driving into the sunset, there was no unicorn dream, and there were Harrison Ford voiceovers. These key differences in the original film, to the director’s cut change the aura of the movie. The final cut of the movie has such a strong aura because it’s exactly how Scott envisioned. He was able to put all of himself into he film, rather than just pieces of himself like in the theatrical release.
            The happy ending was severely insignificant to the movie, and taking it out of the film changed the feelings and emotions viewers were supposed to take away from the film. The happy ending completely changed the aura of the movie and this made Scott uncomfortable. Therefore, he had to recreate the film. Harrison Ford’s voiceovers also changed the aura of the movie. They gave more insight into his characters thoughts and revealed more to the viewers. This made the movie easier to watch, but still took away some of the critical thinking the viewer is supposed to do. The voiceovers interrupt your train of thoughts, and put different thoughts into your head.
            This also brings the question, “Is the theatrical release of Blade Runner the original?” Some, including Scott, would say no. Scott had his vision for Blade Runner before the film was released. Since his visions were different from the resulting film, he would say his visions were the original Blade Runner, even though his version came out 25 years later. So does that mean the theatrical release was a remake? How can it be a remake if it was the first physically made?
            Others would say that the 2007 version is the remake and the 1982 version is the original. These people make up the majority, because the 1982 version did come out first, automatically making it the original. Since the director’s cut is literally the directors recreating the film to further fit their visions, it is considered the remake.

            The last group of people who have an opinion say neither are the original. There was a 1982 work print version that included no happy ending, no voiceovers, and no unicorn dream. This version failed audience tests, and thus it was never released. This version is technically the original. It was the first of it’s kind, but that still doesn’t make it the original in other people’s eyes. Barely anyone knows about this version, so it’s hard to call it the original.