Another great advancement that has come about is
the use of the da Vinci surgical robot.
This is a large robotic machine that the doctor controls and the machine
does all the surgical work on the patient.
This is a combination of human and machine control. A procedure that may have initially been very
invasive and taken a few doctors and several assistants is now done by one
doctor and is minimally invasive. In a
way, this robot is a replica of a few of those doctors that have now been
replaced. However, this is one of the
rare cases where the robot is better than the original. The robot can generally perform the surgery
quicker, with fewer mistakes, and less invasively than the original doctors
could. It is also a good compromise
because there is still one doctor present and in control. It shows a good blend of the human and
technological systems.
The
next idea revolves more around the actual surgeries themselves. Many people today get bones or joints
replaced all the time. It is almost
common practice now for an athlete to have a knee or hip replacement when they
are older. People don’t think twice
about this, but we are replacing the original human knee with an artificial
knee made out of a specific metal or plastic.
Although it serves the same function as the original knee, it is nowhere
near the same as the original. People
who have these replacements will always know it is different. It goes back to the idea that we are all
unique and the things in our possession become unique and special to us in a
specific way. Although it is a little
strange to think about it this way, it is true.
But where this makes a little more sense is when you think about organ
transplants. Think about a heart
transplant for example. First a machine
might be keeping the patient alive, pumping their heart for them. This machine has replaced their original
heart because the original has failed.
Then if the patient is lucky enough, they will receive a “new” heart
from a donor who has graciously decided to donate their organs. This is most definitely not their “original”
heart, but instead, a replacement.
People can get very philosophical or religious when thinking about this,
but in general, the new heart once belonged to another person, who had a
completely different identity. But now
it is in a new person’s body. Because
this is a replacement, is there still an aura and who does it belong to? This becomes very hard to process and think
about. Nia Nikkhahmanesh’s show and tell
on the human head transplant is also a good example of this idea, explaining
how someone might receive another person’s head. If this were to work, the question becomes
which identity would the person have? It
is like two people in one and the body will no longer be the original
body. It will be another person’s body
with a different head. Although there
are many ethical arguments over this, it is hard to think about what aura this
person would have and how they would feel having a real-life replacement body,
not just a prosthetic/mechanical limb replacement for example. Nia’s other blog post talking about
engineered human skin is another example.
Obviously it is not the original skin, but yet it can serve the same
basic functions. But we all know that it
is not the original.
No comments:
Post a Comment