Additionally, in the Black Mirror episode “Nosedive,” everyone’s ratings are on display for
people to see. The paranoia of people viewing one’s rating everywhere he or she
goes promotes good behavior because they know their rating will decrease if
they act imperfectly. Social media companies in real life, although not to the
extent of the company in the Black Mirror
episode, encourage posts to be viewed by as many people as possible. People
will normally post only good or well-behaved content because they will be
ridiculed if they do the opposite. Additionally, public figures or well-known social
media users will typically act respectful and compliant when in a setting
around people (‘below’ them in a social media context) because their social
media may be scorned if they act self-righteous. In another sense, social media
possesses an aspect of surveillance by the government. According to River
Jordan, social media “is able to track and monitor not only to obtain an
insight on each individual but also to forsee actions” (4). When one makes a direct
threat to the government or others, their content is flagged for review by the
government. To avoid having to go through large amounts of content from social
media, the government implements a series of words that will deem the post a
threat. The Panopticon had the same idea: to be able to predict whether someone
was going to rebel through constant surveillance. Therefore, many people talk
about crimes in person rather than on social media to prevent being discovered.
Overall, people may act differently in private while they have privacy,
compared to on social media where they are being viewed. This was the main idea
of the Panopticon: to control individuals by making them feel like they are being
watched or judged by others.
This comparison of social media to Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon has one downside. While the Panopticon would be forced upon the inmates assigned to it, social media is completely voluntary. Although social media does, for the most part, control the population that uses it, it is not required by the government and is not a way to oppress the general population like Big Brother in 1984. Social media is mainly a way for users to keep other users in check through ‘likes’ and comments, especially for the people emotionally invested in it. However, social media does have benefits of improved social communication and faster information sharing. While these benefits improve society, those who regularly use it are controlled. In this era, where the popularity of the documentary impulse is exponentially increasing, more people will begin making social media accounts. Eventually, the controlling aspect of social media may tighten as it becomes harder to keep track of everyone online. Hopefully, society will never enter an age where social media is used against its users because of its Panopticon-esque traits.
No comments:
Post a Comment